<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Updating Python - why we only patch the two most recent]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Why we only patch the two most recent major Python versions</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">Python follows a lifecycle where only the newest major versions receive full support, including official binary installers. Once a version moves into security-fix-only mode, upstream stops shipping these installers.</p>
<p dir="auto"><strong>From Python 3.12 release notes:</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">“Python 3.12 is now in the ‘security fixes only’ stage… releases of those are made irregularly in source-only form... binary installers are no longer provided.”</p>
<p dir="auto">Source:<br />
<a href="https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-31213/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-31213/</a></p>
<p dir="auto">For older versions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Updates are source-only, not packaged installers</li>
<li>No consistent or supported upgrade path on Windows</li>
<li>Effectively shifts maintenance to manual builds or downstream distributions</li>
</ul>
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bottom line:</strong><br />
If upstream doesn’t ship a proper installer, we don’t have a reliable or safe way to patch it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://vulndetect.org/topic/2771/updating-python-why-we-only-patch-the-two-most-recent</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 12:54:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://vulndetect.org/topic/2771.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 08:15:47 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>